×

Click on the desired country to view the percentage of students with adequate learning in reading, mathematics, science, collaborative problem solving and financial education in Pisa.

Hover over the country in which you want to view the learning media, or look for the desired country in the list below.

Click on "View details" to access detailed information on that country

You can also access:

Map of Brazil Learning Data Students’ profile

Help

×

Click on the country in which you want to view the learning averages, or search for the desired country in the list in the side menu.

Click on VIEW DETAILS to access detailed information for that country.

You can select three countries to compare them at the same time.

Country with available data Country with unavailable data Selected country

{{traduzir(selecionado['nome'])}}

×
Ver dados por região

PISA (2018)

PISA (2022)

Country Learning Index (PISA) PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WITH ADEQUATE LEARNING FILTERED BY:

In the Pisa 2017 questionnaire, there is a question about the profession the student hopes to have at the age of 30. This item considers all students who chose careers linked to teaching (teacher) and those who chose other higher education careers.

{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_geral'],1)}}%
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_geral'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_geral'],1)}}%
Data
not present
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_geral'],1)}}%
Science
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_geral'],1)}}%
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_geral'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_geral'],1)}}%
Data
not present
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_geral'],1)}}%
Mathematics
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_geral'],1)}}%
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_geral'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_geral'],1)}}%
Data
not present
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_geral'],1)}}%
Reading
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_sexofem'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_sexomasc'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_sexofem'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_sexomasc'],1)}}%
Data
not present
F M
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_sexofem'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_sexomasc'],1)}}%
Science
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_sexofem'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_sexomasc'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_sexofem'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_sexomasc'],1)}}%
Data
not present
F M
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_sexofem'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_sexomasc'],1)}}%
Mathematics
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_sexofem'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_sexomasc'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_sexofem'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_sexomasc'],1)}}%
Data
not present
F M
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_sexofem'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_sexomasc'],1)}}%
Reading
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_nsealto'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_nsealto'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_geral'],1)}}%
Data
not present
A B
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_nsealto'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
Science
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_nsealto'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_nsealto'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_geral'],1)}}%
Data
not present
A B
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_nsealto'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
Mathematics
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_nsealto'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_nsealto'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_geral'],1)}}%
Data
not present
A B
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_nsealto'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_nsebaixo'],1)}}%
Reading
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_ocupprof'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_cie_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_ocupprof'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_cie_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
Data
not present
P O
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_ocupprof'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_cie_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
Science
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_ocupprof'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_mat_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_ocupprof'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_mat_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
Data
not present
P O
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_ocupprof'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_mat_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
Mathematics
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_ocupprof'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosmedia['perc_lei_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_ocupprof'],1)}}%
{{_.round(dadosbrasil['perc_lei_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
Data
not present
P O
{{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_ocupprof'],1)}}% {{_.round(selecionado['perc_lei_ocupoutra'],1)}}%
Reading
Overall percentage of students with adequate learning
Female Male
High Low
Teacher Other
OECD average
OECD average
COMPARE WITH AVERAGE: Brazil’s OECD’s General

Source: Pisa, OECD. Tabulated by Iede. Note: Mathematics, science and reading data are from Pisa 2018 and collaborative problem solving and financial education data are from Pisa 2015.
+ -
Clear selection
Overall percentage of students with adequate learning
OECD average*
Average for OECD countries, largely composed of developed countries.
Help

Attention: we recommend that this website is viewed in horizontal orientation. Turn your device over to hide this warning!

Click this notice to continue

About Us

×

We are a branch of the QEdu platform, created in 2012 to discuss educational data in Brazil. We believe in education as the foundation for the changes our society needs. In order to have more advanced, just, and equitable countries, it is essential to have quality public education for everyone, without exception. That is the rationale for the existence of this site: to discuss the major inequalities present in Brazilian and global education, particularly related to students’ socioeconomic level, gender, and location. We understand that in the pursuit of equity, thoroughly understanding our inequalities is the first step to addressing them.

We also consider it very important to have a broad vision of education that allows us to discuss student learning beyond language and mathematics, which are obviously fundamental. It is also necessary to know how students are faring in other important skills for the future and life in society, such as collaborative problem-solving and financial education.

We believe it is essential to position ourselves related to the world: how do our countries compare to the best educational systems? And how do we compare to other Latin American countries?

The debate about education needs to gain a sense of urgency and be based on data and evidence. We hope that this site is useful to researchers, policymakers, administrators, educators, and other individuals committed to improving the quality of basic education, whether in Brazil or in neighboring Latin American countries.

Note: QEdu Países considers Level 3 of PISA as the appropriate learning level for 15 and 16-year-olds.

© 2020 QEdu: Use data. Transform education.

Design and development FIB | Fábrica de Ideias Brasileiras

Realization
Support